(( WARNING )) DYNOFLO ENGINES BAD DEALINGS

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-27-2007, 03:34 PM
  #291  
woodsman
Senior Member
DYNO OPERATOR
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 525
Default

Like Carl said I would not take a chance and also while they are doing a freshen up get them to check the bore x stroke to see if its what they said to was. That is if Dyno flow is not doing the work.
woodsman is offline  
Old 06-28-2007, 06:33 AM
  #292  
3dracing
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dothan Al.
Posts: 166
Default

That just shows even a blind hog can find an acorn every now and then.


Steve
3dracing is offline  
Old 06-29-2007, 08:16 PM
  #293  
rpmengine
Junior Member
SHOW GUEST
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5
Default

I would guess that the cap screws were only torque to spec once instead of the four times required to acheive proper stretch as listed by Eagle in all of their paper work.
rpmengine is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 04:26 AM
  #294  
Thunder71
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 14
Default

............
Thunder71 is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 04:30 AM
  #295  
chevguy65
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ID
Posts: 1,122
Default

Originally Posted by Thunder71
Originally Posted by rpmengine
I would guess that the cap screws were only torque to spec once instead of the four times required to acheive proper stretch as listed by Eagle in all of their paper work.
that's what i'm thinking,only a dumb a$$ would'nt check the torque before installing the pan.....sure would of saved some $$$$$$$$$$ but i guess you learned from this experiance 8) live & learn
LOL thunder.

You have no idea...but you are entitled to your opinion.
Do you work for scot?
chevguy65 is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 04:45 AM
  #296  
Thunder71
Junior Member
APPRENTICE
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 14
Default

............
Thunder71 is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 05:05 AM
  #297  
chevguy65
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ID
Posts: 1,122
Default

Well, I see about 1000 people that disser with your opinion.

If I were to double check everyone's work that had told me it is done right, that is all I would do.

The "mechanic" you refer to is a complete hot rod builder and this was the 1st engine he bought without building it himself.
He does a lot more than sit on an engine for 18 months.

Let me ask you a question.
If you had a home built, or bought a new car from a dealership, are you going to go and double check all of their work?
Now, if you say yes, I will flat out call you a liar.

When I bought my last engine, I did not pull it apart to see if it was done correctly and waste my and my builders time. I trusted that what he did was correct.

I am just stating that the buyer should not have to take on that responsibility, tes your correct that if he had it would have saved some money because the engine would have gone right back to scot. Not only were the rod bolts not torqued correctly, but it was not even the correct bore & stroke.

Now, if you found that your engine (supposedly a 454 sbc) was in fact a 521 or 434, are you going to finish the bore on it yourself, to save money, or send it back and expect a full refund, because if he can't get that right what can he do right.

Didn't mean to offend if I did, just pointing out that your logic seems flawed in my opinion.
chevguy65 is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 05:07 AM
  #298  
chevguy65
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ID
Posts: 1,122
Default

PS...the "mechanic" you refer to is very good at what he does, so please stop with the personal attacks on him.

Thanks
chevguy65 is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 05:24 AM
  #299  
lively
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
lively's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 2,190
Default

YOU KNOW I AM A CONTRACTOR-AND I LOOK AT MY SUBS WORK AND VISUALLY DOUBLE CHECK THINGS BUT IF I HAD TO CHECK EVERYTHING IN DETAIL I WOULD GO BROKE[YOUR HIRING THEM TO DO IT RIGHT]-IF IT FAILS THEY DO BACK IT UP OR FACE THE TROUBLE WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS LATER ON ops: ops: --SAME WITH BUILDING CARS AND ENGINES[DO IT RIGHT OR DON'T DO IT!!!]--IF YOU THINK THAT A PROFESSIONAL COMPANY LIKE DYNOFLO/ BOWERS/ OR ALOT OF OTHERS HAVE A RIGHT TO BUILD AND SELL JUNK AND NOT GET CAUGHT AND PUNISHED BY OTHER RACERS THEN YOU MUST LIVE IN A SHELL PULLED DOWN TIGHT!!!---NOW I SAID IT AND FEEL A WHOLE LOT BETTER 8) 8)-LIVELY IN ILLINOIS[P.S.-I HAVE DONE THIS 36 YEARS AND STILL HATE JUNK WORKMANSHIP]
lively is offline  
Old 07-01-2007, 12:15 PM
  #300  
etbird
Senior Member
MASTER BUILDER
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 140
Default

Well shoot if I have to check everyboby's work I might as well do it myself. But since I don't have time to do everthing I would hire a pro. If the pro doesn't do it right, it is on his shoulders, and he has a responsibilty to me to make it right.
etbird is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -