They're back from Selmer,TN

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-04-2010, 09:33 PM
  #131  
Incognegro
Senior Member
DYNO TECH
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 414
Default

Im still laughing at the fact the kid called me out..hahahahh..
Incognegro is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:34 PM
  #132  
dragonmaster093
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: kingsport tn
Posts: 1,729
Default

take 2 seconds to look at balance and see not a 400
dragonmaster093 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:40 PM
  #133  
mopar1968
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
mopar1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abingdon,Virginia
Posts: 3,578
Default

I believe it was a 84 Camaro with a 468 big block chevy from what i could see nice car :!:
mopar1968 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:45 PM
  #134  
MEMRACING62
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: orland pk il
Posts: 2,399
Default

this might explain http://forums.racingjunk.com/viewtop...=14360&start=0
MEMRACING62 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:50 PM
  #135  
mopar1968
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
mopar1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abingdon,Virginia
Posts: 3,578
Default

Now julian look at page 2 and you will see the camaro :!:
mopar1968 is offline  
Old 12-04-2010, 09:58 PM
  #136  
dragonmaster093
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: kingsport tn
Posts: 1,729
Default

good car wasted on dirt bags
dragonmaster093 is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 06:07 AM
  #137  
Incognegro
Senior Member
DYNO TECH
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 414
Default

Now I dont mean to sound like a dik, but why would that guy trade that camaro for a god damn Astro van with some rims? Was he an idiot? Ans you would think that someone who owned a camaro of that caliber would know the difference between a 305 and a 400....So Im guessing him getting screwed over was partly his own fault..


Now that I recall I remember my dad telling me something about a balance weight on the inside of the crank pulley on a 400 motor. He said th fastest way to tell a 350 from a 400 was to run your hand on the inside of the pulley,or the back of it or something..


Either way, did the Camaro guy not have the knowledge or common sense to do that? If not, what did he expect?

And once again Im not defending these white trash inbreeds, but once you inspect the cars and do the deal, you really have nothing to complain about. They did seem to misrepresent the car and get over on someone, however by his own fault IMHO..
Incognegro is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 07:29 AM
  #138  
MEMRACING62
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: orland pk il
Posts: 2,399
Default

agreed....that was my veiw in that case.In the end the camaro had its problems too. was a case of two scammers that ended up screwing each other.....if the clown buying the van didn't know wth he was looking at he didn't belong buying it. they both were trying to pull a fast one & burned each other......perfect!!
MEMRACING62 is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 07:54 AM
  #139  
mopar1968
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
mopar1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Abingdon,Virginia
Posts: 3,578
Default

I agree also,The camaro for a Van :?: :lol: :lol: So now you see julian way we was warning you :?: They do this type of thing to people very often. Now if you will read the messages you got he say's the ad's are under the same name, Now look at what i posted they are not,They are under different names. Lie's on top of Lie's :!: :!: JMO Mark
mopar1968 is offline  
Old 12-05-2010, 09:36 AM
  #140  
Tod74
Senior Member
RACING JUNKIE
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,137
Default

We all know you should not judge a book/race car by it's cover.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFtEw...eature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5oft...eature=related
Tod74 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -